Inconvenient truths that are neither inconvenient nor necessarily true

Wired ought to know better than this. Probably does, in fact. But this feature that purports to tell “inconvenient truths” about environmentalism uses a gimmicky straw man to tell stories that are either trite or insignificant or both. The whole is premised on an invented idea of what it means to be an “environmentalist” before rhyming off supposedly heretical truths:

Winning the war on global warming requires slaughtering some of environmentalism’s sacred cows.

Such as, purportedly, that cities are bad and carbon-trading hasn’t worked. In support of which latter claim, Wired cites the trading system put forward in the Kyoto Accord; we might as well conclude that because Kyoto failed, international treaties on any subject are pointless.

The commenters are letting rip. The word “bollocks” comes up.

Advertisements

2 responses to “Inconvenient truths that are neither inconvenient nor necessarily true

  1. Cities aren’t bad. Nuclear power (if properly life-cycle managed) is good. Carbon Trading (vice phased-in carbon taxes) isn’t going to work. A re-thinking of cars, transport, urbanization, etc, is in order.

    They do have some (though not all) valid points.

  2. Pingback: Questioning WIRED’s “Carbon Blindness” » The Buzz Bin

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s